Plus, rural folks are not major emitters, so it doesn’t really make much sense to even try to find meaningful emission savings there.
“On average, cities and large towns produce about four tonnes of CO2 per capita, compared with more than six tonnes elsewhere in the UK”
“between 1.5 to 3 gallons per mile”, for those wondering
People talk a lot about the genericisation of brand names, but the branding of generic terms like this really annoys me.
I’ll use the example I first noticed. A few years ago, the Conservative government was under criticism for the minimum wage being well under a living wage. In response, they brought in the National Living Wage, which was an increase to the minimum wage, but still under the actual living wage. However, because of the branding, it makes criticising it for not meeting the actual living wage more difficult, as you have to explain the difference between the two, and as the saying goes, “if you’re explaining, you’re losing”.
They’re against anyone else indoctrinating children.
They’re both problems.
Never heard of it. It’s difficult to know how much of the difference is the actual occurrence and how much is the reporting of it.
Don’t all countries have this problem?
Even if you don’t get an answer, it’s good to keep at it long enough that it’s obvious they’re avoiding it.
I would personally enjoy the only article about him ever reaching headline status again being his obituary.
We need another seven for his convictions and sentencing.
Fission is based on the fusion that took place in ancient supernovae.
It’s not even psychology, it’s just the optimal strategy.
Individual constituencies are still two party, it’s just not necessarily always the same two.
For him to lose it he would have to have it in the first place.
I’m referring to the thing Biden didn’t do when he had the chance
What thing?
He did. After blocking the strikes his administration stepped in to negotiate for the unions and got them most of what they wanted.
Trump needs lead water pipes to get votes.