• @aarch64@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      152 minutes ago

      Gas prices in the US are in $/gal, so $6.19 per gallon. Some signs just don’t include the decimal.

      I understand your confusion… I went to Canada for the first time recently and their prices are cents per liter, but (much like American prices) that’s not actually indicated anywhere.

  • @fenrasulfr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    13 hours ago

    We are currently dealing with 10 dollars the gallon in Europe so you have a little bit still to go. I can’t imagine the mess this is making in countries that do not have the US or EU purchasing power.

    • @bridgeburner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      13 hours ago

      Until ur car runs out of gas one time when driving to work, cos 20 bucks doesn’t give u enough gas anymore to drive this far.

  • cub Gucci
    link
    fedilink
    65 hours ago

    Where are my buddies: coal rollers? What happened to them?

    • @imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      158 minutes ago

      If my conversion is correct, that would be aprox 1.45euro/L for Reguolar. Super close to prior-to-iran-war prices but would love to see them pay 2.50.

      For US netizens, again if I am converting the right way, 2.50eur/L of Regular would be around $11 per gallon.

    • @JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      We can’t even do that…

      This is kind of the problem. Most small cars aren’t even sold here. For another example, Ford sells the Mustang. Everything else is trucks, SUV’s, and commercial vans.

  • @jobbies@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    'Murica - we need to CRUSH Iran 💪

    Also 'murica - why is our gas so pricey? 😭😭😭

    • @hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      319 hours ago

      Well, it’s also 87 octane.

      Where I live it’s $6.50 a gallon, but for 95 octane, which I don’t think you can even get in the US.

      • @xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        1318 hours ago

        You’re probably thinking of 95 RON gasoline, but US pumps advertise gasoline in AKI. 95 RON is equivalent to 91 AKI, which is what they’re selling as “Supreme” in the OP photo.

        • @hansolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          118 hours ago

          Whatever it is, my gasoline options are 95 and 100. That’s it.

          Still sounds like you’re saying my options are 91 and 93 AKI or whatever. So the US 87 Regular is lower quality.

          • lagoon8622
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1417 hours ago

            Octane rating has no bearing on the quality of the fuel lmao. It just runs better in engines that are designed to run it.

            Octane rating does not relate directly to the power output or the energy content of the fuel per unit mass or volume, but simply indicates the resistance to auto-ignition under pressure without a spark.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating

          • @xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            418 hours ago

            That sounds about right to me. Some places will sell 93 AKI/100 RON in the US, but it’s not as common, and the only cars that actually require it are probably modified turbocharged cars. Most US commuter cars run perfectly fine on 87 AKI and it’s significantly cheaper. I live in Washington so for some reason they sell 92 AKI gasoline, which is an oddball number I don’t see anywhere else.

            • Blaster M
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 hours ago

              I’ve found older, worn down cars and high compression engines get a lot of spark knock if you don’t use 93. And that’s after making sure everything’s clean inside.

  • @Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    1018 hours ago

    Is this some kind of empirical joke I’m too metric to understand?

    I kid, I’m Canadian so I know off the top of my head a gallon is 3.81 litres.

    • I'm Hiding 🇦🇺
      link
      fedilink
      24 hours ago

      Diesel is equivalent to 2 €/Liter in Australia right now. Given that the country runs on diesel, its a nightmare. Even the few people who don’t own cars are hurting, because the ships that bring in food run on diesel, the trucks and trains that bring the food from the ports to the rest of the country run on diesel. The grain producers and cattle farms, some of which are the size of small countries, all run on diesel. The cost of diesel is hitting everyone.

    • furry toaster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      brazil here, diesel is 6.49 BRL per liter here, that’s less than an euro, turns out all that sugar cane ethanol did help with something0

  • @ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    2523 hours ago

    Honestly, I can’t be bothered to get that worked up about gas. I’ve exclusively bought hybrids for like a decade now, and I’ve moved to areas that are close to work and anything else I want to go to. I fill up less than once a month. If gas is “really high”, it might break $40 for a fill up, which is less than I’d spend at a cheap restaurant if I got an appetizer and two entrees. It’s literally a rounding error on my monthly budget, so even if it was $20/gallon, I would be unfazed.

    • Doubletwist
      link
      fedilink
      2120 hours ago

      We went all EV last year, and it’s been great to not care about the price of gas at the pump.

      The real problem though, is all the other things you buy like clothes and groceries, etc. are impacted by the price of gas and oil used to create it and ship it around. You may not notice the price directly in fueling you car, but eventually, you will be paying dearly because of those high gas prices.

    • @favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Same boat. Gas prices mostly hit people driving gas guzzlers hardest, and that’s actually a good thing. Maybe you shouldn’t drive a “non-passenger work vehicle” that exists purely in a loophole carved out by car manufacturers to avoid fuel efficiency standards as your primary personal vehicle.

      • @tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        US car manufacturers were incentivized to do that and to push for policy and marketing that encourages pickup ownership because pickups have had a protective tariff, making them more profitable than other types of vehicles.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_tax

        The Chicken Tax is a 25 percent tariff on light trucks (and originally on potato starch, dextrin, and brandy) imposed in 1964 by the United States under President Lyndon B. Johnson in response to tariffs placed by France and West Germany on importation of U.S. chicken.[1] The period from 1961 to 1964[2] of tensions and negotiations surrounding the issue was known as the “Chicken War”, taking place at the height of Cold War politics.[3]

        Eventually, the tariffs on potato starch, dextrin, and brandy were lifted,[4] but since 1964 this form of protectionism has remained in place to give US domestic automakers an advantage over imported competitors.[5] Though concern remains about its repeal,[6][7] a 2003 Cato Institute study called the tariff “a policy in search of a rationale.”[4]

        https://www.slashgear.com/1809287/chicken-tax-explained-history-current-impact/

        If you’re an automaker, you want to market those protected vehicles to consumers, because it’s more-profitable. You don’t really have to compete with foreign-made autos in that particular class.

        And you want to lobby for policy that encourages consumers to buy them. So, for example, the US has more-stringent towing standards than does Europe. You need a bigger vehicle to tow a given amount of weight…which encourages buying pickups. And the US has emissions standards that give special preference to large vehicles.

        https://newrepublic.com/article/180263/epa-tailpipe-emissions-loophole

        While the new emissions rules have been praised in most coverage for tightening standards and thus speeding the transition to electric vehicles, they also preserve long-standing special treatment for big trucks and SUVs, which exempt larger cars from more stringent emissions standards. The EPA has made a little-noticed attempt in the rule to keep companies from exploiting the sorts of loopholes they have in the past, but industry giveaways that were added into the final rule could undermine their ability to reduce emissions. When the rules take effect, for instance, starting with cars in the 2027 model year, Ford Super Duty pickups will reportedly be able to emit more than three times as much carbon dioxide as light-duty pickups like the still very large Ford F-150, and nearly four times as much as a passenger car.

        “The biggest pickup trucks are allowed very gentle treatment. If you create a loophole, that’s what they will drive through,” Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity’s Safe Climate Transport campaign, says of the new rules. “Vehicles are getting larger and larger because the larger the vehicle, the weaker the standard.”

    • @Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1822 hours ago

      I also don’t sweat gas prices but it affects a lot of people disproportionately. A lot of low income earners have to drive a lot, either because of the job or because they can’t live closer to where they work. It’s not like they charge a fuel surcharge for lawn care for example.

      • Scrubbles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        020 hours ago

        I have heard this, and it sucks, but also good. Low income earners also have considered gas an “ignorable expense” for too long. It’s something that some budget for, but for most its simply ignored.

        Everyone should realize how much they depend on oil. For low income hopefully they wake up and start considering other modes of travel. Carpools, bikes, transit (and demanding better transit too). It’s not fair that it affects them more, but the vast vast majority of Americans consider gas to be “normal” and its high time everyone gets real with how fragile the system is there.

        • EbbyA
          link
          9
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          But also good?

          Try it sometime. Being poor saddles people with so many extra burdens, what’s one more right? Fuel has never been an “ignorable expense.”

          Lots of this demographic rely on tools and supplies to perform their jobs. How would that work with carpools, bike and transit? It simply doesn’t.

          I had a contractor call up 2 weeks go and tell me he couldn’t fix a problem simply because he couldn’t afford the gas to my site. He’s a great guy we’ve used for years.

          • Scrubbles
            link
            fedilink
            English
            118 hours ago

            I have been poor, most if my life, and I stand by it.

            Your contractor? You’re thinking about gas, and your contractor is. Good. We should be thinking of gas as this wildly volatile thing that can completely upend life on the whim of giant corporations, and thinking of using alternatives.

            • @vaionko@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              13 hours ago

              I think of gas as a necessary thing that I need to buy to get somewhere. I’d LOVE to have an EV or a hybrid but they cost more money than I can spend on a car. The cheapest used hybrid here is 5 times what I paid for my current very reliable diesel.

  • CorrectAlias
    link
    fedilink
    English
    461 day ago

    Sucks that the US is so car-centric. If there was actual public transit (especially of the electric variety), people would struggle a little less.

    • @ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      418 hours ago

      The same thing happened during the pandemic. Cities are built with large zoned swaths for residential, business and commercial all divided. When you can get around easy, that can work. But then suddenly with the WFH shift, entire sections were greatly impacted (such as restaurants in business districts).

      On the other hand, Asian and European cities that have dense mixed use zoning fared much better because the restaurants could serve people regardless if they were wfh or at an office.