- 3 Posts
- 11 Comments
That is just wishful thinking. A large number of people on reddit still use it a lot. Enough to not mind sitting there and moderating. If someone stops moderating they know they can be replaced really quickly now.
The amount of people who just want to shit on reddit with their unrealistic expectations is unbelievable lmao
Dnd here being dungeons and dragons? I watched the movie online but obviously didn’t see the promo. Wishing there was a link to watch the promo on YouTube.
Not trying to be rude but what part specifically rubbed you in the wrong way? I can see it came off as a little formal but nothing that struck out to me.
I choose not to reply about the allegations because I have no information about the situation other than the paragraph you wrote. That still doesn’t render my point invalid that you think someone needs to prove their innocence in a court, even when the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. If there wasn’t enough evidence to prove him guilty then he’s not guilty. Or do you think that everyone who’s ever stepped foot in a court to plead their innocence is guilty, even if the prosecution had no real evidence against the person? Not really invested in the Heard and Depp trial either, but the man had his whole career ruined over it so I think he’s been dealt more than his fair share of punishment.
Edit: Also with all these celeb scandals happening you’d think that celebrities would not use their official or traceable accounts to do shady shit, but maybe that’s expecting too much smartness from them.
He wasn’t supposed to be “found innocent”, he was supposed to be “proven guilty”. The way you put it into quotations makes it sound like you want him to prove his innocence when the burden of proof lies with the prosecution.
I thought only I sit like that
What