• Ludicrous0251
    link
    fedilink
    English
    217 minutes ago

    Or you could just get a dog and never miss someone at the door again.

  • arran 🇦🇺
    link
    fedilink
    English
    137 hours ago

    You know we can roll back the internet a bit… Let’s keep the speed and the unlimited traffic but drop the “always on” and give people “mobile internet hours” for their phone? :P

  • csolisr
    link
    fedilink
    87 hours ago

    In related topics, I’m still peeved that my freezer, unlike my camera, needs to do a full back-and-forth trip (in this case to Samsung’s SmartThings servers) just to notify my Home Assistant server that the door was left open.

    • dream_weasel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 hours ago

      At least it CAN notify. I’ve got a zigbee door sensor glued to the side of the freezer and the door!

      • cenzorrll
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 hours ago

        My fridge is tilted back a very small amount so the door closes on it’s own.

        • Logi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          456 minutes ago

          This is technology I can get behind. How many tokens does a closure take on average?

      • csolisr
        link
        fedilink
        66 hours ago

        It does, and as a matter of fact I was unaware that it had automation support until after I read the manual. But I like to keep statistics on my devices, and I’m not exactly happy about losing them when Samsung or SmartThings decide to pull the plug. Hopefully I manage to patch some alternate firmware somehow by then.

        • @Lodespawn@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 hours ago

          No, it should definitely not need to talk to Samsung to share basic information with your homeassistant

          • csolisr
            link
            fedilink
            35 hours ago

            I agree with that, it’s ridiculous that a known standard still depends on a centralized server

            • @Lodespawn@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 hours ago

              Have you captured the data with Wireshark to see if it’s readable? Could you have adguard/pihole/etc spoof the target DNS to a local server that then strips the data out of the packets and forwards them on to your homeassistant? Or have they garbled the information with some proprietary nonsense?

              • csolisr
                link
                fedilink
                24 hours ago

                I have no idea of how to connect to my freezer directly to capture Wireshark packets, is there a tutorial for that?

                • @Lodespawn@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  34 hours ago

                  If your freezer is on your local wifi and your computer is also on the local wifi you should be able to see all the packets it is transmitting over the wifi with Wireshark on your computer. If either your computer or freezer has a hard connection then you’ll need a little more trickery as switches/home routers minimise network congestion by directing traffic to specific MAC addresses as required.

                  Assuming you are all wifi, basically you load Wireshark (is free software, easily downloaded) and tell it to capture all packets from your wifi adaptor (there should be a handy option on the initial screen when you load the application). Once you start capturing you’ll be capturing everything on your wifi so it pays to be quick with what you want to achieve to minimise the data.

                  So, once you start capturing you open your fridge door a few times, leave it open till it beeps, maybe do that twice, then stop capturing. Following that you will just need to filter the capture by all packets from your fridges network IP or MAC (you should be able to find these from your home router). Once you have all the packets you should be able to click on them and expand all the details to see what data they are sending and where it’s being sent to. You should also see all the packets coming back from the vendor.

      • csolisr
        link
        fedilink
        15 hours ago

        I wonder how expensive would it be to import one of those. The system is also able to track and adjust temperature, so a simple ESP32 wouldn’t be enough to replace that circuitry

        • @cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 hours ago

          The ESP32 wouldn’t be able to adjust settings without a lot of hacking, but it wouldn’t be hard to add a temperature sensor so it could monitor that.

  • @pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I was tempted to run PoE to the other side of the wall where my server is. A doorbell that could do it all locally on my server.

    Then I thought “fuck it” and bolted an antique brass bell there instead. At least you know it’s working.

  • @Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88 hours ago

    So instead of the video doorbell, use a simple camera. Then people knock on the door and you still have security footage without all the nonsense.

    • @glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 hours ago

      There are downsides to consider…

      1. Most people aren’t really phased by doorbell cameras…but everyone feels a security camera pointed at them
      2. The angle is generally worse for this purpose
      3. Unlike a doorbell, there is likely no existing data line or even power
      4. No way to sugarcoat it, security cameras kind of looks like shit. The best you can hope for is one that doesn’t stick out too bad

      There’s options for decent-looking doorbell cameras without all the fuss. I use Amcrest, I know a lot of others use Reolink

  • @Crylos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 hours ago

    Reolink for the win in my opinion.

    Of course a nice brass bell as indicated would work too.

  • EbbyA
    link
    English
    38 hours ago

    Don’t they have relays for chimes?

    Use the chime relay as a trigger for a real doorbell or ESP32 with a speaker.

    Lot less dominos…

    • @__hetz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 hours ago

      They don’t have a traditional doorbell which is why people previously knocked. Since they added the Blink doorbell, people ring the bell. Except there is no bell apart from the speaker built into the Blink… outside the front door… where it can’t be heard by people inside. So you can’t know if someone has rung the bell without having a phone on you to receive the notification. Blink sells a chime that can just be plugged into an outlet. Doesn’t have the best reviews but I would’ve given that a shot first. Maybe it isn’t sold in their market or something.

      • EbbyA
        link
        English
        14 hours ago

        Ahh. From what I saw online, some have 2 screws above the battery compartment that sound like a NO relay to trigger existing systems if the user had them. I suppose it could be a different model.

        • @__hetz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 minutes ago

          I’m not too familiar with Blink products, just that a wall wart bell showed up in a quick search, so it is possible. Most camera doorbells I’ve seen that do have a pair of terminals, they’re to do as you described: connect to the bell circuit to get power and ring the existing bell. I’m doing a bit of inferring, since knocking sounded like the only previous option, that there’s no wire at their door to utilize. Couple that with their being in an apartment and it is likely the only way they’re getting one there is to surface run it. Or run behind any crown molding/baseboard trim they have, but that’s a labor-intensive pain in the ass.