• @radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    292 days ago

    Whatever you pay in insurance is unlikely to cover the damages won by an injured party. That money is coming out of the pockets of people who will never cause an injury.

    Good drivers subsidize the assholes.

    • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 days ago

      Good drivers subsidize the assholes

      The same as healthy people subsidize the sick; or childless people subsidize schools anyway?

      • 8adger
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 days ago

        I’m okay subsiding the schools though! I don’t want to be surrounded by more idiots then I already am.

      • @myplacedk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        42 days ago

        In my country, free schools are not an expense, we profit on it.

        Whatever money we spend on an education, will on average come back twice in the form of increased income tax. Plus of course the other values of living in a well educated society.

        So taking a free education is not society subsidizing you, you are doing society a favor.

      • @Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 days ago

        Rarely.

        Most are crashes caused by someone fucking up.

        Some are caused by things like medical issues - those would be accidents. Or a rock falling off a hillside into your car, tire blowout, etc.

    • @FreshParsnip@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      In other words, not only do you have to pay in case you hit someone, you have to pay for other people hitting people

  • @TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’ve already paid so much money. How many people am I allowed to hit now? I still haven’t hit anyone, so I feel like I’m missing out.

  • @db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    232 days ago

    Not quite, you’re paying insurance to cover the costs which they might decide not to do and you don’t even get a refund for services not rendered.

    • @FreshParsnip@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      32 days ago

      I just made a comment comparing it to damage deposits, but at least you get your damage deposit back if you don’t break anything

      • defunct_punk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 days ago

        you get your damage deposit back if you don’t break anything

        Lol

  • Cevilia (she/they/…)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 days ago

    In the UK you can set up a self-insurance fund. But to do it you have to set aside tens of millions of pounds in a dedicated, easily-accessible fund, and hire an expensive lawyer who knows how to do it. Probably better to just take the hit and invest the millions at that point. I don’t know. I’m not a millionaire. I’m not even a thousandaire. :P

  • @xia@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 days ago

    You have to BET a third party that you WILL hit someone (they pay if you do).

  • EbbyA
    link
    4
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It used to be a driver could present a cashier’s check as proof of financial responsibility, but it was a pretty high sum. There is a similar system with some states where you can purchase a bond that satisfies the insurance requirements. It is quite unpopular though and presents a host of other problems and liabilities.

  • @_chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 days ago

    So like you can do that if you’re rich. You out $1M in a bond, or show some proof annually that you’ve got that available, and poof - that’s your insurance.

    Most people can’t afford a car without payments. So insurance is there so when / if you break someone else’s car, you’ve already made those payments.

    Plus some capitalistic grift for the insurance companies, of course. It’s a courtesy they’re providing you, after all.