

If they actually wanted quality documents for people to use, they would be advocating for Standard Ebooks or something.
Or… you know… have PDFs that aren’t pictures of handwritten text?
Mobile software engineer.
If they actually wanted quality documents for people to use, they would be advocating for Standard Ebooks or something.
Or… you know… have PDFs that aren’t pictures of handwritten text?
Yeah, none of that would be a problem if the car isn’t connected to anything (WiFi, Bluetooth etc.)
This is why technically software is a liability. The less code you need, the better, since every line of code is a potential vulnerability and something to maintain, update, etc.
But is it that different than the podcasts voices Google already generate with NotebookLM since a while ago?
And I already have the next bubble ready: https://youtu.be/wSHmygPQukQ
It could serve both as an explanation of concepts and references to the sources, just like Wikipedia. Ex: it could have pages about Kindle, about Chrome etc. detailing the privacy problems, the timeline of news about them and so on…
Sure it would be a lot of work to have a lot of information, but if it’s something other people can help contribute it could actually grow as a knowledge repository on this subject.
This has quite a lot of links already. I feel like it would be very useful to make some sort of “Wiki” about this.
This is exactly the reason for the emphasis on it.
The reality is that the LLMs are impressive and nice to play with. But investors want to know where the big money will come from, and for companies, LLMs aren’t that useful in their current state, I think one of the biggest use for them is extracting information from documents with lots of text.
So “agents” are supposed to be LLMs executing actions instead of just outputting text (such as calling APIs). Which doesn’t seem like the best idea considering they’re not great at all at making decisions—despite these companies try to paint them as capable of such.