• norbert
      link
      fedilink
      282 years ago

      Shit take.

      Imagine if your kneejerk reaction to a post about a far right Dutch nationalist group is “Wikipedia is librul!!!1” truly braindead shit.

      You should google around and find some things about them that you like or think are being mischaracterized and report back, that’d actually contribute something and we could all learn.

      • hiyaaaaa23
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        While perhaps not the most, uhh eloquent of responses, you are entirely correct.

    • @gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Can you either go back to exploding heads or get a hobby that doesnt involve being an edgelord on the internet in order to get strangers to interact with you?

      • @SaveComengs@lemmy.federa.net
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        That’s untrue!

        The corona vaccines actually spread 5g, because the guvment wants to improve the internet so they can spy on you more!

        I know because a friend of a friend’s cousin’s grandma’s dad’s great grandchild apparently had better 4g connections after getting the vaccine!!!

        This is verified by the Extremely Maybe Sometimes Possibly True Facts Zone

    • cloaker
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      When has Wikipedia’s np ever been credibly described as left wing

            • cloaker
              link
              fedilink
              112 years ago

              Said, in 2006. Sangar has clear bias against wikipedia due to being laid off. In what world is America left wing? Unless you mean from a cultural point of view rather than an economic one, America has a right wing government.

              • @Blamemeta@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                -32 years ago

                That really depends on what you considered developed. Poland swung hard right after the fall of the USSR, for example. They aren’t as developed as the UK or Germany or whatever, but I’d consider them developed.

            • jabberati
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              @Blamemeta I never noticed Wikipedia to have any bias. Again, could you provide an sample of Wikipedia where you noticed a bias and why you think it is biased?

              • @Blamemeta@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                -182 years ago

                Well, the very first place I noticed it was about 10 years ago on the Gamer gate article. Called it a harassment campaign when it was really a married game dev fucking journalists for good coverage. We always knew gaming journalism was corrupt, but it was nice to have proof. Also sucks for the husband who got cheated on. Next day, about 14 separate sites all come with the headline “Gamers are dead”. Since then, either by confirmation bias or reality, I’ve been noticing a lot of bias in Wikipedia articles.

                Link to article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamergate_(harassment_campaign)

                  • I mean when someone comes in with a bullhorn and says “I support gamergate” it’s kind of nice to know you can block them now without having to get in an argument or stressing either of you out. You just know you won’t get along.