From the article - “The agency said Rapp and a fellow bicyclist were riding on a local road when Medina passed them in his car, stopped, and drove his vehicle in reverse. Medina then hit Rapp, and she was pronounced dead after emergency responders brought her to a hospital.”

  • @tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    233 days ago

    It all hinges on the intent to kill. I’m sure he now would say he didn’t intend to kill. just to hit them and teach them to stay off the road. They have enough to charge them with both. And let a jury sort it out.

    • @anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 day ago

      If there’s skid marks, he better get upgraded charges. He has a history of this shit too:

      Those jail records also showed prior arrests for Medina on counts such as deadly conduct by discharging a firearm, assault causing bodily injury, and reckless driving. Dispositions for those cases were not immediately available.

    • @mjr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      363 days ago

      Saying you intended to hit someone with a motor vehicle is saying to intended to kill them, unless you’re provably insane and don’t understand that hitting someone is likely to kill.

      • podian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        Even a legally “insane” defendant would most often be found to have met the “knowing” criteria; the bar is that of foresight or knowledge (including constructed knowledge in some jurisdictions) of “merely” physical harm that is likely to cause grievous injury or death. No metaphysics required.

        For example, acting to cause the stoppage of breath (that “happened” to result in death) is an automatic pass for murder in many common law countries.

    • manxu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      183 days ago

      Agreed, intent is hard to prove. That’s why the law also says, “knowingly.” He definitely knew he could kill someone by hitting them with his car.

      The man had priors for reckless driving, according to the article. And a bunch of other things.

    • @mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 days ago

      just to hit them and teach them to stay off the road

      That right there is intent to commit “an act dangerous to human life” under the Texas murder statute quoted above.

    • @some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      ianal, but I don’t think they could be charged with both murder and manslaughter. Wouldn’t that violate double jeopardy? Otherwise there would be absurdities where people get charged with the whole spectrum of criminal intent just to see what sticks. (Which does totally happen anyway, when they can get away with it.)