@PugJesus@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 21 days agoThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square159fedilinkarrow-up11.43Karrow-down137
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1imageThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.world@PugJesus@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 21 days agomessage-square159fedilink
minus-square@Sergio@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish18•21 days ago probably not going to save 95% of the trees I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
minus-square@LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish35•21 days agoI’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
minus-square@PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglish29•21 days agoI supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”
I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
I’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
I supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”