• 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 years ago

    Is the US still considered first world, or has it been recategorize as second world yet?

      • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 years ago

        Insane comment.

        America has big issues but to compare it’s magnitude of issues, and quantity population affected is a slap in the face to those experiencing life in a real “third world” country.

        • @sheogorath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          TBH, I’m currently staying in a third world country and I feel safer here than in US. YMMV, there’s a lot of third world country as the main definition of third world country is a country that’s not aligned to any political bloc in the Cold War, the West being First World and the Soviet bloc being Second World, hence nations not being aligned to any of those bloc is a Third World.

        • @Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          That’s typical first world problem - oh no, can’t buy a new iPhone this year, I’m so poor…

      • @xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        I recall a time in my youth when a young American could work full time and afford an apartment without splitting it with three roommates.

    • Crass Spektakel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      The Second World would have been the soviet block. There is no second world today. The third world though is real. By definition the US will be always first world as the first world is defined as the pro-wester with heavy industry. No matter how people live in this world.

      • @Rambi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        I don’t think very many people use those definitions for first/ second/ third world anymore. The colloquial definitions of “first world = rich second world = not so rich but not so poor and third world = poor” are more useful anyway due to as you say the Soviet Union not existing anymore so nobody can align with it.

        • Crass Spektakel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          Yeah, back in the cold war that was actually the common perception anyway even while it was initially meant differently. So no harm done using this easy adaption.

    • nyoooom
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Third world was based on who participated in WW2, third world not taking part