• palordrolap
    link
    fedilink
    71 month ago

    Yeah, but then they have to pay someone to maintain it. And low though that cost may be, it’s precisely the sort of thing that C-levels like to cut when they feel like pretending that they actually do something.

    It’s a hard thing for a C-level’s ego to set something up that they know someone else is going to cut later, or worse that they might be the one to “have to” cut it.

    • @Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They have to pay someone to manage the account in the first place. No reason that worker can’t do both.

      • palordrolap
        link
        fedilink
        121 month ago

        Typing in a box on a website provided by someone else can be done by practically anyone, even the boss themselves at a pinch. Heck, some of them love doing that.

        Maintaining a server (or a service on a server) requires someone with more skills, which generally costs more money.

        • madjo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Some smart entrepreneur could offer a Mastodon-server-in-a-box service, where companies only pay hosting fees for company-name.social and a social network employee.

          • @PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            all cost more than just making an account on established service. The cost of changing from Twitter to whatever is probably smaller than half a year of selfhosting or aaS.