• @_g_be@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    507 months ago

    Those resignations are layoffs without having to call them that, there’s no downside for the company

    • @Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      287 months ago

      There’s one important difference: with layoffs, Amazon gets to selectively lay off their worse performers. With mass-quitting, the quitters will be the people who will have the easiest time finding a new job, which I bet is mostly the high-performers, not the low ones

      • @deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The higher paid high performers… They’re not interested in reducing head count as far as reducing staff costs.

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          So they can boost “value” of office space.