@jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world • 9 months agoLawyers for ‘Rust’ armourer move to get case dismissed after Baldwin trial collapseswww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up1262arrow-down19
arrow-up1253arrow-down1external-linkLawyers for ‘Rust’ armourer move to get case dismissed after Baldwin trial collapseswww.independent.co.uk@jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world • 9 months agomessage-square118fedilink
minus-square@Buffalox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•9 months agoObviously because an operational firearm is way more dangerous.
minus-square@SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink2•edit-29 months agoOhhh, I was interpreting the meaning in reverse! I was flabbergasted on why anyone would think an operational firearm is safer than an inoperative prop.
Obviously because an operational firearm is way more dangerous.
Ohhh, I was interpreting the meaning in reverse! I was flabbergasted on why anyone would think an operational firearm is safer than an inoperative prop.