• @Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    08 months ago

    Do you have a source? My understanding was that they were under obligation to not charge for the accommodations, hence the lawsuit.

    • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Their accommodation is having product without milk at all. Requiring them to provide an alternative ingredient isn’t a reasonable accommodation when they have plenty of existing products without dairy. The customer can order one of those items.

      Having a milk substitute that costs more for the establishment is going beyond what is required under the ADA, so up-charging for it is fine.