• @protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      When one says a publication is grossly misleading, it certainly implies the entire publication

      • Chris
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        Often the author doesn’t write he headline. Not sure it matters but most a bit of info.

        • Cosmic Cleric
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          You’re not wrong, but we also should stop excusing, normalizing, and accepting wildly exaggerated for sales purposes titles of articles.

          • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            We should stop accepting lies.

            Unless there is some way this reaction actually did produce twice the energy input, it’s not misleading it’s a lie.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Why have we accepted the standard of misleading headlines? “Oh well you didn’t read the article, I guess you and 90% of eyeballs get to be fundamentally misinformed” is an unhinged take.

      • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        “article” vs “publication”

        Two different things.

        The link takes you to an article. Publications are in actual scientific journals, not intended for popular consumption.

    • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      When I see “publication” I assume it’s the actual scientific paper and not the article reporting on said paper.

    • @Danksy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s easier to nitpick than it is to interact with the actual argument.

      I agree with you. The headline is misleading, and I think it devalues the article.