(ignore the old TV)

an ESPN+ exclusive fight has literally nothing to do with the football

  • @JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    974 months ago

    I can’t ignore the old TV.

    I’m honestly impressed there are still functional, floor-model rear-projection TVs.

    • @Rebels_Droppin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      314 months ago

      I clean out houses for a living, you’d be very shocked how many functional rear projection and CRTs are in use and get thrown out “because old”.

      • Sparky678348
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 months ago

        Heart wrenching and entirely understandable. Those things are both magnificent and inconvenient these days

    • @Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104 months ago

      It’s too heavy to ever get replaced. It’ll still be there after the house is long gone.

  • Ricky Rigatoni
    link
    fedilink
    English
    614 months ago

    I am not going to ignore the old TV. That’s rad as hell and I am jealous.

  • @joenforcer@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    614 months ago

    This is a weird take. That ticker telling you about scores and schedules for a whole bunch of different sports has been on ESPN forever.

    • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      While I understand their point, it’s like going to the channel with the stock market banner on the bottom and complaining it is taking up part of the screen, where I would almost say the other 90% of the screen is the ads.

      So many hours spent watching that as a child. It was either that channel or Bob Barker when I was on summer break

        • ivanafterall ☑️
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I thought sports was about wealthy, unscrupulous white men fighting each other over the right to have the most-talented black men go to work in their fields.

      • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        Nah, that is to keep potential clients interested.

        They keep adding rules to the sport to make it more “TV viewing friendly”, meaning more breaks to show ads. I mean, the superbowl is just ads with sport attached.

        • @mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Look at the sports with systemic ad presence vs sports where it’s all “grass roots.” (The grass roots ones are mostly gone.)

          Most top sports are incredibly expensive to keep running and the ones that become infested with ads are the ones that stick around for us to enjoy. If you follow less popular sports you’ll consider yourself lucky to bring in ads and sponsors.

  • Scrubbles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    384 months ago

    We have very different ideas of what a banner ad is

  • @qwestjest78@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    254 months ago

    Honestly I would take the little banner if it meant there was not comerical breaks. The fact that they do this on top of all the ads they also play at breaks is so over the top. I have been getting into European football and I find it so refreshing that they play 45 mins half straight through. It’s way faster games and there is not the disruption of comericals. In those games they have the banner, but I don’t mind it as much

  • Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    144 months ago

    I actually struggled to identify what part of the screen was an ad, and I’m less able to be outraged about a TV channel displaying what content they will be broadcasting later than ads for unrelated products. Similar to how I’m okay with or even want to see movie previews before a movie, but I better not see a commercial for insurance or consumer electronics.

  • @foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    84 months ago

    That’s actually called a “bug”—not the software error kind, though. In sports broadcasts, we get the classic “score bug,” always been there, usually small and tucked in a corner to keep things low-key. But what you’re seeing here, this whole bottom-of-the-screen takeover, is way more like those old-school news channel bugs from back in the ‘90s or early 2000s. You know, the ones that would stretch across the screen with stock prices, news updates, whatever they wanted to throw at you, right underneath the main action. It’s more intrusive for sure, but not anything wild—it’s actually been around for decades.

    • SanguinePar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      I thought the strip across the bottom was called a chyron? Not heard it referred to as a bug before (not saying you’re wrong though).

      • @foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Maybe in news it is. 🤷‍♂️ My knowledge comes from working with a 3rd party for ESPN. I know ESPN refers to this as the bug. There are “bug operators”, and boy howdy does the producer yell at them when they’re not on their toes.

  • @TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    84 months ago

    That’s fucking irritating.

    I love your tv tho and cant ignore it. My dad had one of these beasts when I was young it had to be over 300 pounds easy. Thing never moved once it was there.